The IZA Discussion Paper Series (ISSN: 2365-9793) disseminates high-quality research by IZA network members to the scientific community and the interested public worldwide before they are later published in academic journals. Comprising more than 17,000 papers, IZA's publication flagship is the most influential working paper series in labor economics.

Submission guidelines for authors

Subscribe to new paper alerts

Search by:

Please provide a valid Search.
Search tips
Wildcard

The character * can be used as a wildcard. For example: *berg

Filter

Type
Type
18 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 16708
Firms and Worker Health
Alexander Ahammer, Analisa Packham, Jonathan Smith
IZA Discussion Paper No. 15336
The Response of Firms to Maternity Leave and Sickness Absence
Ian M. Schmutte, Meghan Skira
IZA Discussion Paper No. 14808
The Value of Sick Pay
Abi Adams-Prassl, Teodora Boneva, Marta Golin, Christopher Rauh
IZA Discussion Paper No. 14346
Friday Morning Fever. Evidence from a Randomized Experiment on Sick Leave Monitoring in the Public Sector
Tito Boeri, Edoardo di Porto, Paolo Naticchioni, Vincenzo Scrutinio
IZA Discussion Paper No. 13379
If Sick-Leave Becomes More Costly, Will I Go Back to Work? Could It Be Too Soon?
Olivier Marie, Judit Vall-Castello
published as 'Sick Leave Cuts and (Unhealthy) Returns to Work' in: Journal of Labor Economics, 2023, 41, 923-956.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 13132
Mandated Sick Pay: Coverage, Utilization, and Welfare Effects
J. Catherine Maclean, Stefan Pichler, Nicolas R. Ziebarth
IZA Discussion Paper No. 12392
Questioning the Stereotype of the "Malingering Bureaucrat": Absence from Work in the Public and Private Sector in Germany
Stephanie Prümer, Claus Schnabel
published in: Kyklos, 2019, 72 (4), 570-603
IZA Discussion Paper No. 11305
The Effect of Self-Employment on Health: Evidence from Longitudinal Social Security Data
Judite Goncalves, Pedro S. Martins
published in: Small Business Economics, 2021, 57(3), 1527-1543
IZA Discussion Paper No. 9867
Labor Market Effects of US Sick Pay Mandates
Stefan Pichler, Nicolas R. Ziebarth
revised version published in: Journal of Human Resources, 2020, 55 (2), 611-659
IZA Discussion Paper No. 9709
Profiling the US Sick Leave Landscape
Philip Susser, Nicolas R. Ziebarth
short version published in: Health Services Research, 2016, 51 (6), 2305-2317
IZA Discussion Paper No. 9091
The Effect of Statutory Sick Pay Regulations on Workers' Health
Martin Halla, Susanne Pech, Martina Zweimüller
IZA Discussion Paper No. 9015
Coming to Work While Sick: An Economic Theory of Presenteeism with an Application to German Data
Boris Hirsch, Daniel S. J. Lechmann, Claus Schnabel
published in: Oxford Economic Papers, 2017, 69 (4), 1010-1031
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8205
A Kink that Makes You Sick: The Incentive Effect of Sick Pay on Absence
Petri Böckerman, Ohto Kanninen, Ilpo Suoniemi
published as "A Kink that Makes You Sick: The Effect of Sick Pay on Absence" in: Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2018, 33 (4), 568-579
IZA Discussion Paper No. 7756
Absence from Work of the Self-Employed: A Comparison with Paid Employees
Daniel S. J. Lechmann, Claus Schnabel
published in: Kyklos, 2014, 67 (3), 368-390
IZA Discussion Paper No. 7250
The Effects of Expanding the Generosity of the Statutory Sickness Insurance System
Nicolas R. Ziebarth, Martin Karlsson
short version published in: Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2014, 29(2), 208-230
IZA Discussion Paper No. 6310
The Effectiveness of Health Screening
Franz Hackl, Martin Halla, Michael Hummer, Gerald J. Pruckner
revised version published in: Health Economics, 2015, 24 (8), 913-935
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5343
The Case for Presenteeism
Simen Markussen, Arnstein Mykletun, Knut Røed
revised version published as 'The Case for Presenteeism - Evidence from Norway's Sickness Insurance Program' in: Journal of Public Economics, 2012, 96 (11-12), 959-972
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1644
Do Financial Bonuses to Employees Reduce Their Absenteeism? Outcome of a Lottery
Wolter Hassink, Pierre Koning
published in: Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 2009, 62 (3), 327 - 342
Type
Display
20 50 100
Type