121 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5325
improved version is available here
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5105
revised version published as 'Teams make you smarter: How exposure to teams improves individual decisions in probability and reasoning tasks' in: Management Science, 2013, 59 (6), 1255-1270
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5104
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4910
revised version published as "Do Ethnic Minorities 'Stretch' Their Time? UK Household Evidence on Multitasking" in: Review of Economics of the Household, 2011, 9 (2), 181-206
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4845
published in: C. Kalenkoski and G. Foster (eds): The Economics of Multitasking, Palgrave MacMillan, 2015
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4828
published in: European Economic Review, 2013, 61 (1), 132-152
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4536
published in: American Economic Review, 2012, 102 (1), 469-503
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4471
published in: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 2021, 94, 101740
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4348
published in: Labour Economics, 2011, 18 (5), 697-707
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4290
see IZA DP No. 7068 for a substantially updated version
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4050
published in: Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 2009, 229 (2-3), 214-238
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3312
published in: Economica, 2012, 79 (315), 534-556.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3229
revised version published in: Journal of Health Economics, 2008, 27(6), 1436-1450
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3154
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3105
published as 'Market characteristics, intra-firm coordination, and the choice of human resource management systems: Theory and evidence' in: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2011, 80 (3), 375-396
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2124
published as "When is it foolish to reward for A while benefiting from B" in: Journal of Labor Economics, 2008, 26 (4), 595-619
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1377
IZA Discussion Paper No. 765
improved version available as IZA Discussion Paper No. 2124
IZA Discussion Paper No. 374
published in: International Economic Review, 2006, 47 (3), 895-936
IZA Discussion Paper No. 119