17,268 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2468
revised version published in: Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2013, 115 (2), 449-475
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2467
revised version published in: Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d'économique, 2010, 43(3), 1040-1057
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2466
published in: Journal of Human Resources, 2008, 43 (4), 815-858
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2465
published in: Labour, 22 (4), 2008, 569 - 591
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2464
published in: Empirical Economics, 2010, 38 (1), 65-84
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2463
published in:Economics Letters, 2008, 100 (3), 399-401.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2462
published in: Economics of Transition, 2007, 15 (2), 342-364
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2461
published in: International Journal of Manpower, 2009, 30 (1-2), 127-144
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2460
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2459
revised version published as 'The 35-hour workweek in France: Straightjacket or welfare improvement? ' in: Economic Policy, 2008, 23 (55), 417-463
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2458
published in: Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second Edition, Palgrave MacMillan: 2008, 609-642
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2457
published in: Labour, 2007, 21(4), 789-808
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2456
published in: Economics of Transition, 2007, 15(4), 759-799
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2455
published in: Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2007, 109 (4), 779 - 806
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2454
published in American Economic Review, 2009, 99 (5), 1689-1713
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2453
published in: International Journal of the Economics of Business, 2007, 14(2), 197-214
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2452
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2451
published in: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2009, 1(1), 229-257
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2450
published as 'Cross country differences in job reallocation: The role of industry, firm size and regulations' in: Labour Economics, 2014, 26, 11-25
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2449
published in: Economic Record, 2009, 85(269), 146-163