17,425 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8306
Cross-National Differences in Wealth Portfolios at the Intensive Margin: Is There a Role for Policy?
published in: Research on Economic Inequality, 2014, 22, 43-85
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8305
substantially revised version published in: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2017, 136, 161-173.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8304
published as 'Flexible working in the UK and its impact on couples’ time coordination' in: Review of Economics of the Household, 2017, 15, 1415–1437
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8303
published as 'Child-Related Transfers, Household Labor Supply and Welfare' in: Review of Economic Studies, 2020, 87 (5), 2290–2321
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8302
published in: Australian Economic Review, 2015, 48(1), 43-64
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8301
published in: Review of Income and Wealth, 2016, 62 (3), 467-488
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8300
published in: Economic Journal, 2017, 127 (604), 2127-2152
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8299
revised version published in: Health Economics, 25(2), 131-147, 2016.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8298
published in: American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2018, 10 (4), 349-77
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8297
published in: Journal of Health Economics, 2015,43, 170-189
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8296
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8295
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8294
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8293
published in: Feminist Economics, 2019, 25 (4), 267 - 308
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8292
published in: Economic Journal, 2014, 124 (580), F644-F683
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8291
published in: Tarmo Valkonen and Vesa Vihriälä (eds.): The Nordic model – challenged but capable of reform, TemaNord 2014:531
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8290
published in: Journal of Economics and Statistics, 2014, 234 (6), 800-826
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8289
published as 'Do Employers Prefer Migrant Workers? Evidence from a Chinese Job Board' in: IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 4(2), 2015,
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8288
IZA Discussion Paper No. 8287
revised version published in: Journal of Economic Psychology, 2017, 63, 168-183