50,032 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5281
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5281
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5280
published as 'Time Allocation and Task Juggling' in: American Economic Review, 2014, 104 (2), 609-623 (theoretical model), and as 'The Inefficiency of Worker Time Use' in: Journal of the European Economic Association, 2015, 5 (19), 906 - 947 (empirical part)
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5280
published as 'Time Allocation and Task Juggling' in: American Economic Review, 2014, 104 (2), 609-623 (theoretical model), and as 'The Inefficiency of Worker Time Use' in: Journal of the European Economic Association, 2015, 5 (19), 906 - 947 (empirical part)
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5280
published as 'Time Allocation and Task Juggling' in: American Economic Review, 2014, 104 (2), 609-623 (theoretical model), and as 'The Inefficiency of Worker Time Use' in: Journal of the European Economic Association, 2015, 5 (19), 906 - 947 (empirical part)
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5279
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5279
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5279
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5279
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5279
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5277
published in: Environment and Planning A, 2011, 43 (11), 2742-2760
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5277
published in: Environment and Planning A, 2011, 43 (11), 2742-2760
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5276
published in: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2013, 37 (1), 104-124
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5276
published in: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2013, 37 (1), 104-124
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5276
published in: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2013, 37 (1), 104-124
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5276
published in: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2013, 37 (1), 104-124
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5275
published in: American Economic Review, 2011, 110 (6), 2754-2781
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5275
published in: American Economic Review, 2011, 110 (6), 2754-2781
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5275
published in: American Economic Review, 2011, 110 (6), 2754-2781
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5275
published in: American Economic Review, 2011, 110 (6), 2754-2781