11,486 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4226
published in: Canadian Journal of Economics, 2010, 43(2), 547-573
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4225
revised version published in: Theory and Decision, 2012, 73 (3), 453-464
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4224
substantially revised version published as 'Did Support for Economic and Political Reforms Increase During the Post-Communist Transition, and If So, Why?' in: The Economics of Transition, 2013, 21 (2), 193-240.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4223
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4223
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4222
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4220
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4219
published in: Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 2010, 64(1), 181-200
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4216
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4212
revised version published in: Journal of Population Economics, 2013, 26 (2), 619-644
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4212
revised version published in: Journal of Population Economics, 2013, 26 (2), 619-644
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4209
published as 'Why was urban over-crowding much more severe in Scotland than in the rest of the British Isles? Evidence from the first (1904) official household expenditure survey’ in: European Review of Economic History, 2011, 15 (1), 127-151
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4209
published as 'Why was urban over-crowding much more severe in Scotland than in the rest of the British Isles? Evidence from the first (1904) official household expenditure survey’ in: European Review of Economic History, 2011, 15 (1), 127-151
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4207
Brain Drain in Globalization: A General Equilibrium Analysis from the Sending Countries' Perspective
published in: Economic Inquiry, 2013, 51 (2), 1582–1602
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4206
published in: Economics of Education Review, 2011, 30 (6), 1348-1369
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4205
revised and extended version published in: Management Science, 2011, 57, 611 - 627
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4203
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4202
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4202
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4200
published in: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2009, 1(2), 190–225