50.226 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3165
revised version published as "Choosing the Best Training Programme: Is there a Case for Statistical Treatment Rules?" in: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2010, 72 (2), 172-201
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3164
published in: Journal of Monetary Economics, 2009, 56(8), 1074-1085
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3164
published in: Journal of Monetary Economics, 2009, 56(8), 1074-1085
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3164
published in: Journal of Monetary Economics, 2009, 56(8), 1074-1085
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3164
published in: Journal of Monetary Economics, 2009, 56(8), 1074-1085
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3164
published in: Journal of Monetary Economics, 2009, 56(8), 1074-1085
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3164
published in: Journal of Monetary Economics, 2009, 56(8), 1074-1085
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3163
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3163
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3162
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3162
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3161
substantially revised and rewritten version available as IZA DP No. 3502
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3161
substantially revised and rewritten version available as IZA DP No. 3502
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3161
substantially revised and rewritten version available as IZA DP No. 3502
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3160
published in: Economics of Education Review, 2010, 29 (1), 94-103
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3159
published in: Journal of Legal Studies, 2008, 37(S2), S217-S252
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3159
published in: Journal of Legal Studies, 2008, 37(S2), S217-S252
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3158
published as 'The public-private sector gender wage differential in Britain: evidence from matched employee-workplace data ' in: Applied Economics, 2011, 43 (26), 3819 - 3833
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3158
published as 'The public-private sector gender wage differential in Britain: evidence from matched employee-workplace data ' in: Applied Economics, 2011, 43 (26), 3819 - 3833
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3158
published as 'The public-private sector gender wage differential in Britain: evidence from matched employee-workplace data ' in: Applied Economics, 2011, 43 (26), 3819 - 3833