353 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3524
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3450
substantially revised version published in: Oxford Handbook on Economic Inequality, Oxford University Press, Oxford et al., 2009, 455 - 490
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3260
published in: International Journal of Manpower, 2009, 30 (1-2), 70-82
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3233
published in: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2011, 3 (2), 1-40
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3180
published in: Journal of Urban Economics, 2008, 64 (2), 326-339
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3150
published in: Journal of Population Economics, 2009, 22 (3), 757-772
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3063
published in: Journal of the European Economic Association, 2008, 6 (2-3), 424-433
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3050
published in: Urban Studies, 2009, 46 (9), 1879-1898
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3010
published in: Economics Letters, 2008, 99 (3), 454-457
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3001
published in: Review of Economics of the Household, 2008, 6 (3), 193-221
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2987
revised version published in: Journal of Regional Science, 2009, 49 (5), 833 - 854
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2866
revised version published in: Inquiry, 2013, 50 (4), 275-295.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2765
published as 'A City-Wide Experiment on Trust Discrimination' in: Journal of Public Economics, 2013, 100, 15-27
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2765
published as 'A City-Wide Experiment on Trust Discrimination' in: Journal of Public Economics, 2013, 100, 15-27
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2738
published in: Journal of Econometrics, 2010, 155 (2), 99-116
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2712
revised version published in: Applied Economics Letters, 2009, 16 (11), 1165 - 1169
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2696
published as "Gift giving and worker productivity: Evidence from a firm-level experiment" in: Games and Economic Behavior, 2009, 67 (1), 233-244
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2632
published as 'Sin City? Why is the Divorce Rate Higher in Urban Areas' in: Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2009, 111 (3), 439 - 456
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2572