2.926 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 844
revised version published as IZA DP 2293 and in: American Economic Review, 2007, 97 (3), 999 - 1012
IZA Discussion Paper No. 839
revised version published as 'Is training more frequent when the wage premium is smaller? Evidence from the European Community Household Panel' in: Labour Economics, 2008, 15(2), 272-290
IZA Discussion Paper No. 835
published in: Labour Economics, 2004, 11 (4), 451-468
IZA Discussion Paper No. 825
published in: Labour Economics, 2005, 12 (1), 125-145
IZA Discussion Paper No. 822
published in: Economic Policy, 2007, 22 (50), 235-287
IZA Discussion Paper No. 821
published in: J. Heckman and A. Krueger, Inequality in America: What Role for Human Capital Policy?, MIT Press, 2003
IZA Discussion Paper No. 814
published in: Journal of the European Economic Association, 2003, 1 (1), 224-244
IZA Discussion Paper No. 807
IZA Discussion Paper No. 806
published in: International Economic Review, 2003, 44 (4), 1337-1357
IZA Discussion Paper No. 805
published in: Labour Economics, 2010, 17 (6), 875-885
IZA Discussion Paper No. 802
published in: Journal of Human Resources, 2006, 41 (4), 821-840
IZA Discussion Paper No. 800
published in: Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 2005, 6 (2), 171-188
IZA Discussion Paper No. 795
published in: Journal of Labor Research, 2004, 25 (2), 233-266
IZA Discussion Paper No. 792
published in: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2004, 54 (2), 137-151
IZA Discussion Paper No. 789
published as 'Gender segregation and the wage gap in Portugal: An analysis at the establishment level' in: Journal of Economic Inequality, 2005, 3 (2), 145-168
IZA Discussion Paper No. 785
published in: Journal of International Economics, 2007, 72 (1), 75-96
IZA Discussion Paper No. 783
published in: Journal of Labor Economics, 2004, 22 (3), 689-722
IZA Discussion Paper No. 778
IZA Discussion Paper No. 776
published in: Indian Economic Review, 2004, 39 (1), 55-79
IZA Discussion Paper No. 774
published in: Population Research and Policy Review, 2005, 24 (6), 5-30