65 IZA Discussion Papers
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5301
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4570
published in Economica, 2010, 77 (305) , 1-19.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4182
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4181
published in: Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2009, 11 (6), 947 - 960
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4179
published in: CESifo Economic Studies, 2011, 57 (2), 349-364
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3777
revised version published in: Journal of Cultural Economics, 2010, 34 (1), 1-26
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3411
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3348
published in: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2011, 3 (3), 144-174
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3306
IZA Discussion Paper No. 3261
published in: B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy: Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, 2010, 10 (1), Article 22
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2843
published in: American Economic Review, 2011, 101 (4), 1274-1311
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2836
Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil’s Publicly Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes
published in: Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2008, 123 (2), 703-745
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2563
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2547
published in: in: Heise, Michael, Tilly, Richard, Welfens, Paul J.J. (eds.), Integration, Financial Markets and Innovations – 50 Years of EU Dynamics, 2007, 75-108.
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2541
published in: Journal of Economic Psychology, 2009, 30 (2), 228-245
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2315
published in: Economies: The Open-Access, Open-Assesment E-Journal, 2007, 1
IZA Discussion Paper No. 2116
revised version published as 'Manon Domingues dos santos and Etienne Lehmann, 'Wage Rigidity or Fiscal Redistribution: The credibility Issue' in: Economics Bulletin, 2012, 32 (4), 2801-2807
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1798
published in: International Finance, 2006, 9 (3), 317-342
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1570
published as 'Minimum wage or negative income tax: why skilled workers may favor wage rigidities' in: Spanish Economic Review, 2008, 10 (1), 63-81
IZA Discussion Paper No. 1478
published in: Journal of Public Economics, 2006, 90(1-2), 171-188